Transactions on Transport Sciences 2023, 14(2):32-47 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2023.006

Usability of Road Infrastructure for Persons with Mobility Impairment

Christy C. Nwachia, Chukwuemeka G. Ogbonnaab, Musa A. Wushishia
a. Department of urban and regional planning, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 1526 Owerri, Nigeria
b. SHELL Centre for Environmental Management and Control, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, 410001, Nigeria

Globally, there have been sustained efforts at addressing inclusion by providing access to safe, accessible, reliable, and affordable transport systems for all, including persons with mobility impairment. Individuals or groups such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, whose capacities to travel are restricted by some permanent or temporary frailties have been generally referred to as Persons With Mobility Impairment (PWMI). While many city dwellers take mobility for granted, it is not the case for PWMI as their travel experiences are marked by exclusion and frustrations due to inherent barriers in transport infrastructure and services. This study examined usability of road infrastructure for persons with mobility impairment. The study was centred on six randomly selected cities in Nigeria. Survey research design was employed by which primary data were collected through geometric measurement, observation, and the use of structured questionnaire. We adopted the Safety, Accessibility, Reliability and Affordability (SARA) analytical framework for data analysis. Statistical analyses of data were done using descriptive statistics, Analysis of Variants (ANOVA), and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The study found insignificant numbers, and (in some cases), complete non-existence of pedestrian infrastructure and universal design facilities on major roads in the investigated cities. Most of the roads examined have facilities in less than 20% of the required locations. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean number of facilities across the selected roads and across the six cities studied. More than 90% of respondents rated each of the usability indices (safety, accessibility, reliability, and affordability) low. Generally, roads in Nigerian cities are characterised by structural barriers which impede safety and accessibility for people with mobility impairment thereby making them experience unreliable and less-affordable journeys, reflecting the low usability of road infrastructure across the cities.

Keywords: Mobility impairment; Nigeria; People with disabilities; Road infrastructure; Usability

Received: November 14, 2022; Revised: January 30, 2023; Accepted: March 1, 2023; Prepublished online: April 25, 2023; Published: September 5, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nwachi, C.C., Ogbonna, C.G., & Wushishi, M.A. (2023). Usability of Road Infrastructure for Persons with Mobility Impairment. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 14(2), 32-47. doi: 10.5507/tots.2023.006
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abdulquadri, A., Kieu, T. A., and Nguyen, N. P. (2021). Digital transformation in financial services provision: A Nigerian perspective to the adoption of chatbot. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(2), 258-281. doi.org/10.1108/JEC-06-2020-0126 Go to original source...
    2. Agarwal, A. and Chakravarti, D. (2014). Universal accessibility guidelines for pedestrian, non-motorised vehicles and public transport infrastructure. New Delhi: SSEF. Retrieved from https://shaktifoundation.in/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Universal-accessibility-guidelines.pdf
    3. Agarwal, A. and Steele, A. (2016). Disability considerations for infrastructure programmes. Evidence on Demand - Climate and infrastructure livelihoods. doi.org/10.12774/eod_hd.march2016.agarwaletal Go to original source...
    4. Anazonwu, N., Okah, P., Chukwu, N., Agha, A., Iwuagwu, A., Onalu, C. et al. (2022). Barriers to domestication and implementation of disability Act in Southeast Nigeria. Journal of Social Work in Developing Societies Vol.4(1). Pp. 33-50. Retrieved from https://journals.aphriapub.com/index.php/JSWDS/article/view/1532
    5. Andrews, N., Clement, I., and Aldred, R. (2018). Invisible cyclists? Disabled people and cycle planning-a case study of London. Journal of Transport & Health, 8, 146-156. doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.145 Go to original source...
    6. Ciesla, M. (2021). Modern urban transport infrastructure solutions to improve the safety of children as pedestrians and cyclists. Infrastructures, 6, 102. doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6070102 Go to original source...
    7. Department for Transport. (2021). Inclusive Mobility: A guide to best practice on access to pedestrian and transport infrastructure. Department for Transport Great Minister House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-transport
    8. Disabilities Opportunities Internetworking and Technology [DOIT]. (2022). What is the difference between accessible, usable, and universal design? Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/doit/
    9. European Conference of Ministers of Transport [ECMT]. (2000). Improving transport for people with mobility handicap - A guide to good practice. OECD Publications Service, Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/cem/
    10. Farinloye, T., Aririguzoh, S., and Kieu, T. A. (2019). Qualitatively exploring the effect of change in the residential environment on travel behaviour. Travel Behaviour and Society, 17, 26-35. doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.06.001 Go to original source...
    11. Fasina, S. O., Salisu, U. O, Odufuwa, B. O., and Akanmu, A. A. (2020). Travel behaviour and mobility challenges of disabled elderly in selected cities of Ogun State, Nigeria. LOGI - Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics Vol. 11 (1); pp.25-36. doi.10.2478/logi-2020-0003 Go to original source...
    12. Federal Government of Nigeria [FGN]. (2019). Discrimination against persons with disability (prohibition) Act 2018, laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Nigeria Health Watch. Retrieved from https://nigeriahealthwatch.com
    13. Holstein, E. V., Wiesel, I, and Legacy, C. (2020). Mobility justice and accessible public transport networks for people with intellectual disability. Applied mobilities, Vol. 7(2), pp. 46-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2020.1827557 Go to original source...
    14. Igomy, T. (2021, September 12). Disabled by fate, denied rights to mobility: Nigerians living with disabilities tell tales of anguish accessing public transportation. The Punch Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.punchng.com
    15. Iwarsson, S. and Stahl, A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design--positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disabil. Rehabil. 2003, 25, 57-66. doi.org/10.1080/dre.25.2.57.66 Go to original source...
    16. Jirgba, K., Adeleke, O. O. and Adeke, P. T. (2020). Evaluation of the accessibility of public transport facilities by physically challenged commuters in Ilorin town, Nigeria. AZOJETE,16(4):651-662. Retrieved from www.azojete.com.ng
    17. Kett, M., Cole, E., and Turner, J. (2020). Disability, mobility and transport in low- and middle-income countries: A thematic review. Sustainability, 12, 589; doi.org/10.3390/su12020589 Go to original source...
    18. Mace, R. L., Hardie, G. J., and Place, J. P. (2008). Accessible environment: Towards universal design. The Centre for Universal Design, North Carolina State University, USA. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm
    19. Mandy, J. B. and Jawad, S. (2018). Women's marginalization in Nigeria and the way forward. Human Resource Development International, 21(2), pp.1-19. doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1458567
    20. Mogaji, E., Adekunle, I. A., and Nguyen, N. P. (2021). Enhancing transportation service experience in developing countries: A post pandemic perspective. The future of service post-COVID-19 pandemic, vol.1, 177. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4126-5_9 Go to original source...
    21. Mogaji, E., and Nguyen, N. P. (2021). Transportation satisfaction of disabled passengers: Evidence from a developing country. Transportation Research Part D. Transport and Environment, 98, 102982 doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102982 Go to original source...
    22. Mogaji, E., Bosah, G., and Nguyen, N. P. (2022). Transport and mobility decisions of consumers with disabilities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1-17. doi.org/10.1002/cb.2089 Go to original source...
    23. Risser, R., Haindl, G., and Stahl, A. (2010). Barriers to senior citizens' outdoor mobility in Europe. Eur. J. Ageing 2010, 7, 69-80. doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0146-4 Go to original source...
    24. Roberts, P. and Babinard, J. (2004). Transport strategy to improve accessibility in developing countries. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17685
    25. Ross, T., Bilas, P., Buliung, R., and El-Geneidy, A. (2020). A scoping review of accessible student transport services for children with disabilities. Transport Policy, 95, 57-67. doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.06.002 Go to original source...
    26. Soetan, T. O., Mogaji, E., and Nguyen, N. P. (2021). Financial services experience and consumption in Nigeria. Journal of Services Marketing, 35(7), 947-961. doi.org/10.1108/JSM-07-2020-0280 Go to original source...
    27. Stafford, L., and Baldwin, C. (2018). Planning walkable neighbourhoods: Are we overlooking diversity in abilities and ages? J. Plan. Lit.33, 17-30. doi.org/10.1177/0885412217704649 Go to original source...
    28. Stjernborg, V. (2019). Accessibility for all in public transport and the overlooked (social) dimension-a case study of Stockholm. Sustainability, 11, 4902; https://www.doi:10.3390/su11184902 Go to original source...
    29. United Nations [UN]. (2018). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
    30. Venter, C., Sentinella, J., Rickert, T., Maunder, D. and Venkatesh, A. (2004). Enhancing the mobility of disabled people: Guidelines for practitioners. TRL Limited, Berkshire. Retrieved from https://trl.co.uk/uploads/trl/documents/
    31. World Bank. (2020). Disability inclusion in Nigeria: A rapid assessment. World Bank, Washington. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34073
    32. World Health Organization [WHO] (2011). World report on disability. WHO/NMH/VIP/11.01. Retrieved from http://www.who.int Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content