Transactions on Transport Sciences 2023, 14(2):21-31 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2023.002
How Children with Mild Intellectual Disability Experience Self-driving Buses: In Support of Agency
- a. Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- b. Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- c. VTI, The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden
- d. Department of Informatics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Emerging technology for public transportation is often not fully aligned with an inclusive design strategy. Many people with intellectual disability experience their needs and desires not being fully considered. Responding to this problem, the purpose of this study is to investigate how children with mild intellectual disability experience self-driving buses. On each bus, a person called "safety driver" monitors the ride and takes control if a problematic situation arises. The purpose is also to investigate what roles support persons and safety drivers play. In addition, the research aims to propose improvements in how the design of these self-driving buses can better motivate children with intellectual disability to use them in support of their agency. To address this, we arranged and studied seven rides on self-driving buses, for 16 children diagnosed to have mild intellectual disability, and their support persons. Interviews with the children were held after the rides, and both the rides and interviews were video recorded. The analysis was in part inductive but also employed a theory based on motivation: self-determination theory. For several children, the bus worked as a vehicle for a social sightseeing tour of the local environment, and the current design did not hinder such an experience. Overall, many of the children had a positive experience, but there is room for improvement regarding the design of the buses. Some children expressed curiosity and a few frustrations with how the bus behaved in traffic. For instance, it was difficult for the children to understand why the bus braked for things that were hard for them to perceive. From observation, it appears that the accompanying support person and safety driver played an important role in making children safe and shaping the social environment on the bus. The support persons were also essential for some children to ride the bus at all. The safety driver provided the children with information about how the bus worked. Both the safety driver and the support person had a positive impact on the children's experience. To meet the children's needs and skills, and to improve their motivation for riding the buses again, the buses need to decelerate less abruptly, have easier and consistently designed seatbelts, and communicate what they do, see, and signal more clearly. We argue that further studies at this level of detail are crucial to ensure that new technologies are indeed designed for everyone.
Keywords: Accessible and sustainable mobility services; Self-driving buses; Children with intellectual disability; Self-determination theory; Agency
Received: September 29, 2022; Revised: January 21, 2023; Accepted: February 1, 2023; Prepublished online: April 19, 2023; Published: September 5, 2023 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Anderson, R., Manoogian, S. T., & Reznick, J. S. (1976). The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 915-922.
Go to original source...
- Archer, B. (1995). The Nature of Research. Co-design, January 1995, 6-13.
- Bodde, A. E., & Seo, D-C. (2009). A review of social and environmental barriers to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal 2, 2(2), 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.11.004
Go to original source...
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Go to original source...
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352.
Go to original source...
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201-216. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Go to original source...
- Charisi, V., Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Li, J., & Evers, V. (2017). Children's views on identification and intention communication of self-driving vehicles. In P. Blikstein & D. Abrahamsson (Eds.), "Logo: The Next 50 Years" - Proceedings of the 16th annual Interaction Design and Children conference (pp. 399-404). Stanford University: IDC.
Go to original source...
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Go to original source...
- Gjermestad, A., Luteberget, L., Midjo, T., & Witsø, A. E. (2017). Everyday life of persons with intellectual disability living in residential settings: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Disability and Society, 32(2), 213-232.
Go to original source...
- Holloway, C., & Barbareschi, G. (2022). Disability Interactions: Creating Inclusive Innovations. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Go to original source...
- Huan, Y., Arvola, M., & Holmlid, S. (2020). Three Perspectives on Inclusive Service Design: User-Centred, Adaptive Systems, and Service Logics. In Y. Akama, L. Fennessy, S. Harrington, A. Farago (Eds.), Proceedings of the ServDes.2020: Tensions Paradoxes Plurality (pp. 36-55). Linköping University Electronic Press.
- Larsson, K. (2021). Children's perspective on future travels by autonomous bus. [Master thesis, Malmö University]. DiVA. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1576129&dswid=-5553
- Malterud, K., Siersma, V. K., & Guassora A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760.
Go to original source...
- McDonnell, A., Benham, S., Fleming, C., & Raphael, A. (2021). Community-based Public Transportation Training with the Integration of Assistive Technology: A Pilot Program for Young Adults with Intellectual Disability. Technology and Disability 33, 109 - 121.
Go to original source...
- Palmqvist, L., & Danielsson, H. (2020). Parents act as intermediary users for their children when using assistive technology for cognition in everyday planning: Results from a parental survey. Assistive Technology, 32(4), 194-202.
Go to original source...
- Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74. doi: 10.1177/1094670514539730
Go to original source...
- Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts-one goal? On the concept of accessibility-historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in Information Society, 14(4), 505-526. doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
Go to original source...
- Raven J., Rust J., Chan F., & Zhou X. (2018). Raven's 2 progressive matrices, clinical edition (Raven's 2). Pearson.
- Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: Organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701-728.
Go to original source...
- Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226-249.
Go to original source...
- Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E. L., (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 68-78.
Go to original source...
- Schalock, R. L., & Luckasson, R. (2004). American association on mental retardation's definition, classification, and system of supports and its relation to international trends and issues in the field of intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1(3-4), 136-146.
Go to original source...
- Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R. A., & Shogren, K. A. (2007). The renaming of mental retardation: Understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 45(2), 116-124.
Go to original source...
- Verdonschot, M. M. L., de Witte, L. P., Reichrath, E., Buntinx, W. H. E., & Curfs. L. M. G. (2009). Impact of environmental factors on community participation of persons with an intellectual disability: a systematic review. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(1), 54-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01128.x
Go to original source...
- Wiberg, M. (2018). The Materiality of Interaction - Notes on the materials of interaction design, MIT Press.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.