Transactions on Transport Sciences 2020, 11(2):28-38 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2020.006

A large-scale study on the speed-calming effect of speed humps

Niels Agerholma, Lasse Høyrup Sørensenb, Pelle Rosenbeck Gøega, Harry Lahrmanna, Anne Vingaard Olesena
a Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, Thomas Manns Vej 23, Aalborg Oe, 9220, Denmark
b COWI Aalborg, Visionsvej 53, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark

Inappropriate speeding is one of the main causes for traffic-related injuries and fatalities. Studies have shown that more than 50 % of Danish car drivers regularly speed on urban roads and nearly 75 % of them speed on rural roads. Physical speed-calming measures, particularly speed humps, are widely used to reduce speeding in urban areas in the Danish road network. However, speed humps are often located based on reasons other than ensuring that they have the best effect on reducing the speed of vehicles. Furthermore, their speed-calming effect is not utilised sufficiently. This study evaluated more than 570 speed humps on roads with a 50 km/h speed limit. The main results reveal that speed increases with an interval between speed humps of up to 200 m at approximately 60 km/h. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between the distance from the roadside to the roadside buildings. The actual interval between speed humps ensures that suitable driving behaviour is carried out is 52 m, 70 m and 164 m for through roads, main roads and residential roads, respectively, in cases in which roadside buildings are situated farther from the road. Similar values were found for the intervals between speed bumps on these three types of roads (67 m, 89 m and 261 m, respectively) when there is a shorter distance between the roadside and the roadside buildings. Overall, speed humps are an efficient way to reduce speeding in built-up areas; however, aside from the interval between the speed humps, the distance from the roadside to the roadside building is the only significant factor contributing to the speed of the car for drivers on these roads.

Keywords: Speed Calming; Speed Humps; Traffic Safety

Received: February 2, 2020; Accepted: May 22, 2020; Prepublished online: May 22, 2020; Published: September 11, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Agerholm, N., Sørensen, L.H., Rosenbeck Gøeg, P., Lahrmann, H., & Vingaard Olesen, A. (2020). A large-scale study on the speed-calming effect of speed humps. Transactions on Transport Sciences11(2), 28-38. doi: 10.5507/tots.2020.006
Download citation

References

  1. Agerholm, N. (2011) Speed regulating Effects of Incentive-based Intelligent Speed Adaptation in the short and medium term. Aalborg University.
  2. Agerholm, N. et al. (2014) Full-Automatic Parking registration and payment: In principle GNSS-based road pricing. 10th ITS European Congress, Helsinki, Finland 16-19 June 2014, Helsinki: ERTICO - ITS Europe, 1-9.
  3. Agerholm, N., Knudsen, D. and Variyeswaran, K. (2017) Speed-calming measures and their effect on driving speed - Test of a new technique measuring speeds based on GNSS data, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 263-270. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.022. Go to original source...
  4. Ambros, J., Novák, J., Neuwirth, P., Kieć, M., Dudek, D., Andriejauskas, T. (2017) Using speed profiles to investigate the impact of traffic calming measures, 29th International Baltic Road Conference, Tallinn, 1-6.
  5. Antic, B., Pesic, D., Vujanic, M., & Lipovac, K. (2013) The influence of speed bumps heights to the decrease of the vehicle speed - Belgrade experience, Safety Science, 57, 303-312. Go to original source...
  6. Danish Road Directorate (2013) Håndbog - Fartdæmpere, Anlæg og Planlægning (Manual - Speed Calming Measures, Facilitation and Planning. Denmark.
  7. Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 829-836. Go to original source...
  8. Eksler, V., Popolizio, M., & Allsop, R. (2009) How far from Zero? - Benchmarking of road safety performance in the Nordic countries. Brussels.
  9. Elvik, R. (2001) Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effects, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(3), 327-336. Go to original source...
  10. Elvik, R. et al. (2009) The Handbook of Road Safety Measures: Second Edition, Oslo: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Go to original source...
  11. Elvik, R. (2013) A re-parameterisation of the Power Model of the relationship between the speed of traffic and the number of accidents and accident victims, Accident Analysis and Prevention. 50, 854-860. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.012. Go to original source...
  12. Gitelman, V. et al. (2016) Changes in road-user behaviors following the installation of raised pedestrian crosswalks combined with preceding speed humps, on urban arterials, Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 356-372. Go to original source...
  13. Gøeg, P. R. et al. (no date) Effects of GDPR applied to FCD, in, 14th ITS European Congress, Lisbon, 1-10.
  14. Hauer, E. (1997) Observational before-after studies in road safety - Estimating the effect of highway and traffic engineering measures on road safety. Toronto: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  15. Jørgensen, M. et al. (2013) Driving speed on thoroughfares in minor towns in Denmark, 26th ICTCT Workshop, 1-10.
  16. Karlgren, J. (2005). Bilisters hastighetsval i relation till gaturummets utformning och händelser (Drivers' speed choice in connection with the street design and incidents). Gothenburg.
  17. Lahrmann, H. et al. (2012) ITS Platform North Denmark: idea, content, and status, 19th ITS World Congress, 1-12.
  18. Lahrmann, H. et al. (2013) The development of an open platform to test ITS solutions, in 9th ITS European Congress, Dublin, 1-5.
  19. Nilsson, G. (2004) Traffic safety dimensions and the Power Model to describe the effect of speed on safety, Lund: Lund Institute of Technology and Society, Traffic Engineering. Retrieved from: https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/b0b1da1a-1971-4524-8f51-3909c8cf8d43.
  20. Rosbach, O. (1996) Miljøprioriterede gennemfarter - Effekter i 21 byer - Rapport 70 (Environmentally prioritised thoroughfares - effects in 21 towns).
  21. Rosén, E., Stigson, H., & Sander, U. (2011) Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(1), 25-33. Go to original source...
  22. Várhelyi, A. (1996) Dynamic speed adaptation based on information technology: a theoretical background. Bulletin 142.
  23. Wellis, W. et al. (2004) 21 miljøprioriterede bygennemfarter - Den trafiksikkerhedsmæssige effekt (21 Environmentally prioritised thoroughfares - the traffic safety effect).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.