Transactions on Transport Sciences 2018, 9(2):67-75 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2018.002

Assessing the Influence of Greenery on the Behaviour of Road Users1

Karin Ausserer, Ralf Risser
FACTUM OG, www.factum.at

The share of active mobility in traffic - walking and cycling - can be increased by enhancing of the urban vegetation; this is the core assumption of the Austrian project "GoGreen". The main objective of this research project was to elaborate criteria of the roadside greenery that need to be incorporated into the planning of urban and street spaces, and finally implemented in order to create a highly aesthetic and stimulating atmosphere in public spaces. In addition to literature studies, qualitative methods (expert interviews, focus groups) and quantitative methods (street surveys) were used in this project to identify the needs and wishes of the residents. Subsequently, internal and external workshops helped to design evaluation criteria and recommendations for ordinary measures for promoting and supporting active mobility. In this paper, we focus on the street surveys that allow a glimpse on how citizens perceive the relationship between appropriately set urban vegetation, with respect to safety and attractiveness among other things, and its potential to motivate (more) citizens to walk (more).

Keywords: urban greenery; active mobility; life quality; road user behaviour

Received: November 30, 2017; Accepted: March 25, 2018; Prepublished online: September 16, 2018; Published: December 22, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ausserer, K., & Risser, R. (2018). Assessing the Influence of Greenery on the Behaviour of Road Users1. Transactions on Transport Sciences9(2), 67-75. doi: 10.5507/tots.2018.002
Download citation

References

  1. Acebillo J. ( 2012) A new urban metabolism Barcelona / Lugano, Actar, New York, Barcelona
  2. Adkins A., Dill J., Luhr G., Neal M. (2012) Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4), S. 499-510 Go to original source...
  3. Arnberger A., Eder R. (2012) The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(1), S. 41-49 Go to original source...
  4. Bein N., Petica St., Plichtova J., Petrjáno¹ová M., Risser R., Sardi G.M, Ståhl A. (2004) Final Report, of the EU-Project HOTEL: How to analyse Life Quality, an accompanying measure within the EU fifth Framework Programme Keyaction "Improving the Socio Economic Knowledge Base"; HPSE-2002-60057, Bratislava & Vienna
  5. Bowler D.E., Buyung-Ali L., Knight T.M., Pullin A.S. (2010) Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3), S. 147-155 Go to original source...
  6. Weber C., Tschannen E., Winkler R., Graf S., Bähni I. (Eds.)(2006) Grün Stadt Zürich: Das Grünbuch der Stadt Zürich
  7. Dinnie E., Brown K.M., Morris S. (2013) Community, cooperation and conflict: Negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112(1), S. 1-9 Go to original source...
  8. Ehmayer C. (2015) Partizipative Aneignung des öffentlichen Raums am Beispiel des Wiener Donaukanals, in: Psychologie in Österreich Nr. 2 2015, S 140-146
  9. Han B., Cohen D., McKenzie T.L. (2013) Quantifying the contribution of neighborhood parks to physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 57, S. 483-487 Go to original source...
  10. Hydén Ch., Nilsson A., Risser R. (1997) WALCYNG: Walking and Cycling instead of shorter car trips, Final report. Institute for Technology & Society. University of Lund and FACTUM, Vienna
  11. Knoflacher H. (1996) Zur Harmonie von Stadt und Verkehr. Freiheit vom Zwang zum Autofahren, Wien: Böhlau Verlag
  12. Methorst R., Risser R., Sauter D., Tight M., Walker J. (2010) Cost 358 Pedestrians' Quality Needs. PQN Final Report
  13. Müller (2008) Internationale Best Practices, Öffentlicher Raum und ruhender Verkehr, Wien: Im Auftrag der MA 19, MA 21 A und MA 18
  14. Mursch-Radlgruber E., Trimmel H. (2015) Räumlich und zeitlich hochaufgelöste Temperaturszenarien für Wien und ausgewählte Analysen bezüglich Adaptionsstrategien, Bericht 2. Teil, "Räumliche Differenzierunge der mikroklimatischen Eigenschaften von Wiener Stadtstrukturen und Anpassungsmaßnahmen". Institut für Meterologie, Universität für Bodenkultur im Auftrag der Wiener Umweltschutzabteilung, MA 22 der Stadt Wien, S5-6
  15. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C. (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4(3-4), S. 115-123 Go to original source...
  16. Peters K., Elands B., Buijs A. (2010) Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), S. 93-100 Go to original source...
  17. Tyrväinen L., Ojala A., Korpela K., Lanki T., Tsunetsugu Y., Kagawa T. (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, S. 1-9 Go to original source...
  18. Van den Berg A. E., Hartig T., Staats H. (2007) Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63, S. 79-96 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.